|
Surrey - a good place to live
With its proximity to London and beautiful
countryside Surrey has for long been a desirable place
to live.
Today Surrey also boasts:
|
|
Excellent international links -easy reach
of Heathrow, Gatwick and Eurostar. |

|
|
Good road connections - the M25,
which sweeps across the north of Surrey, links with the national
motorway network |
|
Good schooling (state, private and
international). |
|
An outstanding range of beautiful
houses. |
|
Thousands of acres of woods and heathland,
many of which are freely accessible for public enjoyment. Surrey
is the most densely wooded county in England. |
|
The lowest crime rate of any county
in England. |
|
Great sporting opportunities – horseracing,
horse-riding, tennis, village cricket and more golf courses
than any other English county. |
|
Quality shopping. |
|
A wealth of dining experiences. |
|
It’s not surprising therefore that homes in
Surrey are much in demand. Indeed, apart from London, Surrey
has on average the most expensive property in the UK. Of course,
this is bad news for home buyers but on the positive side
this also means that Surrey property has proved to be an excellent
long-term investment.
return to top
Surrey
People
What kind of people live in Surrey?
Usually when journalists refer to Surrey they sloppily use the outdated cliche "Surrey's stockbroker belt" which refers back to the early part of the last century when affluent City professionals commuted by train from large mock
Tudor houses in Surrey and enjoyed a privileged lifestyle - playing
golf, (the wife played tennis) superintending the gardener
and driving the Jaguar or Bentley to the local pub for
a gin and tonic. Maybe this stereotype did once exist
in vast numbers, but no longer, and today you are as likely
to find a very different type of wealthy person living
down a Surrey lane. There are pop stars ( Eric Clapton
at Ewhurst, Ringo Starr at Cranleigh, Mick Hucknall
at Walton-on-Thames, Brian May at West End) media celebrities (Michael
Caine at Leatherhead, Judi Dench at Outwood and glamour model, Jordan, at Woldingham) and sport
superstars ( Jimmy White in Cobham, Colin Montgomerie and Jamie Redknap
in Oxshott, Sir Geoff Hurst in Weybridge). Lots of Chelsea Football Club players, including John Terry, the England football captain, have moved into the environs of Cobham, following the establishment of their training ground in the town. Surrey even has a smattering of royals -
Prince Edward (the Queen’s youngest son) and his
wife live at Bagshot Park near Woking.
The same qualities that attract celebrities
(large houses in private settings and excellent transport
communications with London and the rest of the world)
also attract successful business people from around
the globe. The
ACS International Schools at Cobham and Egham (with
students from nearly 50 nationalities) and TASIS The
American School in England at Thorpe act as magnets
for foreigners needing to buy or rent near London, but
wanting to live somewhere quieter and greener. Today
there are large numbers of American, Scandinavian, German,
Dutch, Far Eastern, Italian (particularly at Woking)
and now even Russian residents in key areas of Surrey.
As a result there can be something of a cosmopolitan
atmosphere, and in shops in places like Cobham or Esher
you are as likely to hear a foreign accent or a foreign
language as an English voice.
Towns near the M25, such as Guildford, Chertsey and Leatherhead, have grown as major business centres in their own right, and major companies have moved into new European headquarters in Surrey. The county has a surprisingly high global profile in the international computer and technology industries. Thus while once Surrey was a domitory county, whose residents had to commute to London to earn high salaries, this is no longer the case, and many highly-paid Surrey residents now work within the county.
return to top
Surrey
- North versus South
|
| Surrey
has a variety of different identities and there is a
marked difference between the north and the south of
the county. Much of north-eastern Surrey has been swallowed
up by London, so that the towns of Richmond, Kingston,
Sutton, Merton, and Croydon are now London Boroughs,
though they are still geographically in Surrey. These
areas are either urban or suburban with high density
housing, but some do have pockets of green open spaces
(in the case of Richmond Park an extremely large pocket).
The further south you go in the county, the more rural
and greener it becomes. In general, south of the greater
London boundary, it is a leafier, more spacious environment;
and south of the M25, the landscape becomes even more
expansive, with a rolling countryside that is dotted
by small and often very pretty villages.
return to top
|
| Surrey
towns and villages
Surrey’s major towns in general still manage
to retain distinctive personalities; the southern towns of
Guildford, Farnham, Dorking, Haslemere and Reigate have county
town atmospheres. Richmond, Guildford and Woking are particularly
strong on cultural pursuits and are well supplied with the
usual range of shops and retail chains. Kingston and Croydon
provide a huge choice of retailers, including large department
stores, while Richmond aims to be a trendier, more exclusive
shopping experience. Guildford, Dorking, Farnham and Reigate
retain a slightly more old-fashioned approach and more independent
shops, although Guildford (now a thriving employment centre
in its own right) has a sophisticated edge.
Surrey is renowned for having some of the prettiest, and
most photographed, villages in England, typically set
around a large green, with an assortment of mellow,
period houses often accompanied by an ancient church.
Brockham, Chiddingfold, Dunsfold, Shere and Shamley
Green are among the most picturesque villages. In some
villages an old-fashioned community spirit persists.
Creeping suburbanisation has ravaged many other former
villages but vestiges of former charms can still be
seen in places such as Ewell, Carshalton, Merstham ,
Godstone and Shepperton. |
|
KINGSTON
TOWN CENTRE
|
CHIDDINGFOLD
GREEN
return to top |
|
Road/Rail/Air
Road Communications
Today we are so much dependent on the car that
our daily living patterns are often determined by the road systems near our homes. Surrey enjoys some good
fast roads, but as it is an affluent county, traffic flows
on Surrey roads are almost twice the national average. All
over the county, former quiet residential roads that can provide
alternative access to towns and villages, or to key routes,
are now heavy with traffic. Indeed, the junctions in such
residential roads are often clogged with lengthy traffic queues
during the rush hour.
The efficiency of the road network varies enormously
across the county with many A roads passing through towns
and villages, rather than skirting them. In general, the west
and centre of the county has a better road network than the
east of Surrey
The M25 sweeps through the north of the
county for fast access to the national motorway network (in
particular the M4,M3,M40, M1, M20,M26, M23 and M11, Heathrow
and Gatwick ). Of course the M25 can become horribly
conjested and is notorious for traffic jams caused by accidents
and road works. The section between junction 9 and Heathrow
(dual four to six lanes) is one of the busiest roads in Europe.
The M23 connects the M25 directly and
quickly with Gatwick airport. The M3 cuts through
the north west of the county with just three junctions in
Surrey. It provides efficient access to Hampshire and the
south-west of England (very popular at weekends) but its northern
termination at Sunbury is often traffic-locked.
The A3 which runs out of London
and south-west through the county towards Hampshire
feels like a motorway with its three lanes sweeping
past towns. When it has free-flowing traffic, it is
an extremely good, fast route to and from London, but
it is very busy in peak hours and there can be hold-ups.
The newly opened tunnel at Hindhead (to be factually
accurate, two tunnels) should put an end to the lengthy
traffic jams that used to occur at this spot and allow
the A3 to flow easily into Hampshire.
The A31 connects
Farnham and Guildford via an effective dual carriageway.
The A30 running along the north east borderland
of Surrey is generally a quick road. The Blackwater
Valley Route (A331) in the far east of the
county links Camberley and Frimley with Farnham and
is often mistaken for a motorway.
Nearer the centre of the county the A24
south of Leatherhead is another good fast road which travels
towards Sussex and the south coast. Emerging from greater
London, the A217 south of Sutton is a dual or three
lane carriageway as far as the M25.
With the exception of the above roads, many
of the so-called A roads are single carriageways and are not
particularly quick. In general, because of the density of
the population and the high ratio of cars to people, most
of the north of the county is prone to traffic congestion.
In the south of the county the roads are emptier, but away
from the major routes mentioned above they are slower and
meandering; it can often take an unexpectedly long time to
cover a relatively short distance, especially in the Surrey
Hills. Many villages in the south do not have quick access
to fast roads.
Rail Communications
|
|
CLICK ON MAP FOR ENLARGED IMAGE
The coming of the railway in the nineteenth century was not
met with universal delight and consequently the locations
of some railroutes and stations are idiosyncratic rather than
logical. For example, since Surbiton, instead of the much
bigger town of Kingston, gained the main line station, the
result is that today Surbiton, rather than Kingston, has the
faster and more frequent train journey to London. If travel
to London via train is an important criterion for house hunters,
it is essential to check services and journey times, since
sometimes locations further out can have faster train access
to London than stations that are actually nearer the capital
(e.g. trains from Chessington, part of greater London, take
35 minutes to Waterloo whereas a fast train from Woking, much
further out to the south-west, can take only 29 minutes to
Waterloo). Wimbledon, Surbiton, Guildford, Woking, Richmond
and Staines are stations blessed with extremely frequent train
services to London.
London terminus stations that can be accessed from
Surrey - Waterloo, Victoria, London Bridge
& Charing Cross. Many lines also stop at Vauxhall. Thameslink
trains pass through the north-east fringes of Surrey (now
part of greater London). Thus Redhill and East Croydon stations
connect via Thameslink with London Bridge, Farringdon and
Kings Cross. Sutton, Carshalton, Mitcham, St.Helier, Morden,
South Merton and Wimbledon connect with Blackfriars, Farringdon
and Kings Cross. Note that theAnglia Railways service on the map has been discontinued. Stations in the west of
Surrey are linked to West London e.g. Hounslow.
In addition to the above railway map, Virgin Trains operates
a limited service that connects Guildford with the Midlands
and the North, as well as Portsmouth and Gatwick.
STOP PRESS - June 2009. A proposal is afoot to reinstate
the defunct railway line from Guildford to Cranleigh
that was closed over forty years ago. A report from
The Association of Train Operating Companies has recommended
reinstating the train service. At present, it's just
a proposal, so watch this space for further news.
For detailed information on timetables see the websites
for South West Trains,
South
Central, Thames
Trains, Anglia
Railways and Virgin
Trains, or UK
Rail Information.
The London Underground -The towns of Richmond and
Wimbledon are on the London Underground District Line, while
Morden and South Wimbledon are on the Northern Line.
|
| 
Airports
Surrey is extremely well placed for access to international
and national flights. London’s Heathrow airport
sits just to the north-west of Surrey, while London’s
second airport, Gatwick, is just to the south-east of
the county. There are fast motorway communications to
both airports.
What's that Noise?
It is often said that it is almost impossible
to escape the distant (or not so distant) hum of traffic in
Surrey. There is also aircraft noise to contend with, especially
for people living under the flightpaths of Gatwick and Heathrow
- both these major airports are adjacent to Surrey's boundary.
The blackspots for aircraft noise are in the north-west and
south-east of the county – places such as Staines and Richmond
upon Thames in the north-west and Charlwood in the south-east.
Under the latest thirty-year plan for UK air travel, further expansion is decreed for Heathrow but the Government has decided that there will be no new runway at Gatwick until after 2019 and then only if environmental factors prevent the proposed new runway at Heathrow. In March 2004 the British Airports Authority published a draft plan for Gatwick's future growth. This includes a large increase in passengers and the possibility of a second runway, the latter not until after 2019.
There are also small aerodromes at Redhill and Chobham.
For home buyers parcticularly concerned about aircraft noise, Surreyhomesearch has access to detailed flightpath maps for both Heathrow and Gatwick which are available to clients. www.surreyhomesearch.com
The proposal to build a train
freightline beside the M25 looks as if it has been squashed after the scheme failed to get Government support. The freightline would have impacted on areas alongside the the M25 and
included a nine-mile tunnel to the north of Leatherhead
emerging at Merstham. Local groups had protested against the proposal which was showing up in property searches undertaken during conveyancing for homes within 200 metres (670ft approx) of the route.
return to top |

Property Types
| If there was ever
such a thing as a traditional Surrey house style it was perhaps
best captured in Helen Allingham’s late 19th century paintings
of rural cottages (above, click
on image for enlargement). Though very romanticised, her houses
were real ones; the paintings were the artist’s way of recording
beautiful old buildings for posterity. Some of these picturesque
timber-frame houses with their steeply-pitched, clay-tiled roofs
can still be found in more rural, southern parts of Surrey though
many are now unfortunately on busy main roads.
One of England’s most celebrated architects, Edwin
Lutyens (1869 -1944) developed the Surrey vernacular style at
the end of the nineteenth century and he built a number of stunning
houses in Surrey, mostly south of Guildford, which are highly
sought after and very expensive. Many of them had gardens designed
by Gertrude Jekyll , England's most famous plantswoman, who
lived at Munstead Wood near Godalming, in one of Lutyens' earliest
houses.
The Lutyens' Surrey style – sweeping roofs
and soaring chimneys, tile hanging, multiple gables, leaded
lights, exposed timbering and handcrafted details – became
hugely influential and was copied around the world. Other
architects working in the first half of the twentieth
century (for example Baillie Scott and Blair Imrie ) also
designed in the Surrey vernacular and these kinds of houses
are fairly common in Surrey, especially in and around
Guildford, Esher, Weybridge and West Byfleet.
This Surrey style became so popular, developers
adopted it in the 1930s using some of its most basic elements
for building houses en masse. The word "tudorbethan"
was coined by detractors as a term of abuse to describe modern
pastiches of the Surrey style. Surrey has an abundance of tudorbethan
suburban houses, both detached and semi-detached, and while
architectural purists may knock them, many home buyers still
love them. |



|
|
|
Surrey
is not blessed with many genuine Georgian period houses (1714-1837)
whether detached or terraced. However, most towns and
villages have at least one good example of a detached
Georgian house in a pleasing, if central, location. Epsom, Farnham,
Richmond, Petersham, Guildford, Dorking, Chertsey and
Reigate have a rather better selection of good Georgian
properties than elsewhere. Because of their rarity, Georgian
houses command a high premium but they are also often on main roads. Buyers must
be prepared to be less fussy about location. Georgian
houses tend to remain with the same owners for a long
period and are often sold privately.
There is a slightly better supply of Victorian
housing (1837 -1901) especially small terraced properties and
late Victorian villas, the latter in a range of sizes including
large rambling properties standing in several acres and neat
little detached houses. Norman Shaw (1831 - 1912) was a leading
Victorian architect who designed many houses in Surrey, particularly
in and around Guildford, and his brick and tile-hanging style
was much copied around the county, noticeably at Haslemere and
Weybridge. |
| From the 1930s onwards
(with a gap during the war years) new houses shot up
in Surrey, mostly on smallish estates. The majority
of Surrey's housing stock is from these more recent
times and there is a huge supply of late twentieth century homes. Although there is hardly any virgin building land in
the county, developers are still managing to find plots. Most new housing tends to be executive style
homes (either individual or small estates), apartments
or terraced housing. Indeed with recent Government guide-lines demanding higher density, developers are now concentrating on apartments and multi-storey "town" houses. Styles are mainly traditional,
even pastiches, and there is very little adventurous
or innovative housing being erected in Surrey.
Land prices in Surrey are very high and
there is a growing tendency for developers to pull down
tired, outdated housing in prime locations and erect
swish new homes that enjoy mature settings. Sometimes
a number of new houses will be squeezed into the large
plot of a demolished house, but increasingly individual
houses are being torn down to be replaced by just one
new property. The latest trend is for enormous monster houses, many of them still in the grandiose mock-Georgian style derisively known as "footballers' houses". Large redundant buildings (eg hospitals)
are also being divided up and converted into modern
homes.
Developers who specialize in the Surrey
area include Octagon, Fairclough Homes,
Bryant Homes, Charles Church, Barratt, Latchmere Properties,
Fairview, Laing Homes, Bewley Homes, Kingsway, Beaumonde
Homes, Crest Nicholson and Try Homes.
See Surrey
New Homes Directory. |
 |
|
| Something very
strange has happened to Surrey prices. The county has many
desirable and highly priced areas, but it used to be a general
rule that the further you went from London the markedly cheaper
these desirable locations became. Thus there was a gap between
prices in Esher and, a few miles further out, Cobham and an
even larger gap between the prices in Esher and those in Guildford.
This is still true but to a much lesser extent, the gap has
diminished. So that nowadays housing in and around Guildford
is not startlingly cheaper than that in the north of the county.
(A fact that reflects the growth of Guildford as a very successful
business centre in its own right. Its workers have also upped
the prices of property in the surrounding villages.) Indeed
you can even sometimes now pay more for the same kind of property
in a desirable location in the south of the county than in
a less desirable location in north Surrey. (Guildford is more
expensive than Croydon or Sutton in all categories of housing).
Moreover, a number of major companies have relocated many
members of staff to new office premises built near the M25
and this has put pressure on the supply of local housing and
pushed up prices. Generally, the east of the county and the
area along its western boundary offer cheaper buying opportunities,
but there are drawbacks to these areas which are the reasons
for the lower prices.
Price falls - some myths laid to rest
Do not be misled into thinking that
property prices in Surrey are immune from falls or
even crashes. In the last property slump (1988-94)
prices fell as dramatically here as elsewhere, disproving
the myth that the rich are somehow protected against
economic downturns or hikes in interest rates. Instead,
in the 1989/91 debacle it was obvious that much expensive
Surrey property had been bought largely with borrowed
money and many swanky homes in prestigious locations
such as St George's Hill were repossessed by the banks.
The current market collapse has likewise affected
Surrey and property prices have tumbled. A lot of
the recent boom was fuelled by high-earning employees
in the financial industry and the shake-out in the
City has had negative effect on Surrey's house prices.
|
|
What’s the market doing
now?
9th January 2012
It was no surprise to anyone that the Surrey property market in December was exceedingly quiet. The final month of the year is normally and understandably a very subdued one, with few sales and even fewer new instructions, and this year was no exception. Estate agents were able to tidy their drawers, send corporate cards and enjoy their office Christmas parties at leisure, although given the grim economic outlook, the festive cheer was rather muted.
The few sales that were agreed in December were achieved through serious effort on the part of agents and realism on the part of vendors. Indeed, realism has become the new template for the market, with agents attaching all their hopes to this word in the expectation that it will be a kind of talisman to see them through the vicissitudes and challenges of the next twelve months. After all, realism is a far more attractive and positive concept than that of falling prices.
Amid the quietness of the December market, some agents were able to busy themselves with valuation sorties to properties whose owners are looking to sell in the new year. Meanwhile a number of unsold properties were withdrawn from the market prior to the festive season, no doubt destined to reappear on agents' lists in 2012.
Prices
Since there was such scant market activity in December, there is little significant comment to be made on prices achieved, bar the fact that almost without exception prices were very negotiable. The only exceptions (and this has been true for many months) were those homes occupying outstanding locations in the most desirable areas and with near-perfect accommodation (in terms of number and size of rooms and the layout). When such properties come to the market, buyers recognise the rarity and will often pay above the asking price to secure such special homes. Unfortunately, agents can't always identify these houses and will often put high valuations on lesser properties in the hope that buyers will pay a premium, and in boom times they will, but not in the current weak market.
The Future?
The first few days of 2012 brought wild winds to Surrey, toppling many of the county's mature trees. Could this be an omen for the property market this year? Indeed, the outlook is bleak - as we have been forecasting for some time. The general economic background is full of woe and has been exacerbated by the eurozone crises. The decline in mortgage availability which has been a problem for the property market since the banking crisis of 2008, but which was starting to improve last year, looks set to deteriorate further in the coming months because of a general shortfall in bank funding, caused by eurozone debts. With wholesale funding sources drying up for banks, money for mortgages will be in short supply.
Normally, the property market in Surrey gets off the blocks swiftly in January with first-time-buyers, eager to purchase before prices rise in the spring, but as in recent years, ftbs will be in short supply in 2012, despite the fact that prices at the bottom of the market have fallen considerably. For most fibs it is not the price of property that is now the biggest hurdle but the need to amass a large deposit to access the limited supply of affordable mortgages. Moreover, the impetus to buy in order to beat price rises is likely to be replaced by a wait-and-see approach in the expectation of further price falls. Caution and uncertainty are likely to characterise not just the ftb market but the market in general.
However, the ending of stamp duty relief for ftbs on properties up to £250k may well inject some motivation close to the deadline of March 25th, but probably only amongst those who are already well on the way to purchasing a property. As noted above, many would-be ftbs are likely to wait to see if prices will drop further, a tactic which could easily produce greater savings than the avoidance of the 1% stamp duty.
A more important positive influence on the market in 2012 will be the ongoing, historically low Bank of England interest rate which seems set to remain the same as long as the country's economic woes continue. Low mortgage rates for those with substantial deposits will allow the market to avoid total stagnation and for affluent, confident purchasers to secure the best properties.
No one has a crystal ball to predict how the eurozone crisis will play out, or how bad things will be before they get better. Certainly the UK economy looks as if it will experience tough times for the first half of this year at least. Further down the line, inflation is expected to fall later in the year which should have a beneficial effect on personal finances. But once the economy starts to pick up, then interest rates will begin to rise and this in turn will have a negative effect on the property market. On the other hand, there is a huge amount of pent-up demand for property purchase which has built up over the last eighteen months and once this is able to be released, the impact on prices is likely to be very significant. Yet, it is hard to see when financial and economic conditions will allow this pent-up demand to be released and to be met by sufficient mortgage lending.
Overall we predict a very weak market in the coming months. Indications are that there will be a large influx of new instructions coming to market unusually early in the year, adding to what is already an exceptionally strong supply of homes for sale. With few serious buyers around, most homes will remain unsold and prices will fall, with the exception of the best of the best houses in each price sector. Turnover will remain low, but if vendors can refrain from being greedy, sales will take place. In line with 2010, the best performing sector of the market is likely to continue to be good family houses, in the best locations priced under £1m.
As always, buyers should exert caution in assessing the value of a property. A house or flat is only worth what someone is willing to pay for it at a certain time and if affordable funding is available.
We were mostly right - apart from interest rates!
As always at this time of year, we look back over the previous twelve months to assess how accurate, or otherwise, our monthly predictions have been. As usual, we were more right, than wrong, although like nearly every other professional commentator we did predict that the Bank of England interest rate would have to rise from its historical low of 0.5%. Back in January 2011 we said that "before long" interest rate "must rise" and we continued saying much the same for many months - but the rate has remained unchanged to this day!
Our predictions over the year were also for a weaker market than the various house price indices have recorded. The Halifax has recorded a fall of only 1.3% over the year while Nationwide has recorded a rise of 1% (both indices for the country as a whole). The Land Registry whose statistics just go to November, shows a price fall of only 0.6% for Surrey. Yet, at Surrey Houses we know of many price falls of 10% and more, and of many homes that have failed to find buyers over the year. Moreover, official statistics reveal that the number of sales in Surrey was very low last year. So what really was happening in 2011? How to explain the discrepancy between the price performance statistics and the experience of vendors?
Part of the explanation is that, given the straightened times and mortgage restrictions, it has been the most affluent who were buying and they bought the best properties, not the cheapest. Another explanation could be that agents put inflated valuations on properties (i.e. higher than the previous year) but have then dropped the price to get a sale, so the selling price was not much different from the previous year's. Furthermore, the indices only record sales (or for the Halifax and Nationwide, only agreed sales, not completions). They ignore all the houses languishing on the market unsold. Evidence of real price falls in Surrey can be found on the property website www.propertysnake.com.
Looking back at our monthly forecasts, in December 2010 we predicted that, "It is unlikely that the property market will wake up with a flourish in January". We went on to say, "We anticipate that next year there will be a demand for the best homes in the best locations, but it will very much be a two-tier market and sales will depend on realistic pricing from both agents and vendors."
In January we continued to predict a "declining market." "Prices for the best properties are likely to hold firm .......the best houses in the best locations (the areas of the county that are already the most expensive) being in demand and experiencing little change in prices, but in contrast most of the property for sale in 2011 will fail to find buyers and there will be a substantial drop in prices (around 10% in the lower reaches of the market and up to 25% above £1.5m." In fact, many prices at the lower end have fallen by more than 10%, while falls of 25% above £1.5m though they have existed, have been few in number, falls in this price sector have more typically been around 15%.
In March we forecast that that there would be "no spring revival - sales will be historically low and will not constitute a proper market rally.... At the upper levels of the market, overseas buyers will make more of an impact." Both these predictions proved accurate.
In April we anticipated that the royal wedding would create a "slowdown in activity" during late April and early May. "After that we can expect the market to just tick over, with the very best properties in the best locations finding buyers but not at very inflated prices, while the majority of houses for sale will fail to find buyers and consequently prices will fall back." Again, this is what happened. Agents reported a slump in activity in the normally busy April/May period and after that the market continued to be relatively quiet.
In May we commented that " the feel good factor of wonderful weather, double Bank Holidays and the royal wedding was deceptive" as we continued to predict a falling market.
In June we posted that, "new inflationary pressures - including energy and food prices will further decrease people's finances and consumer confidence". From then on, until the end of the year, our predictions followed a monotonous pattern as the market itself settled into a dreary, plodding mode lacking in fireworks. We did though predict two positive trends, "the re-emergence of the buy-to-let investor and overseas buyers at the top of the market", but this was really an attempt to counter our doom-laden comments with some notes of cheer regarding minor trends of activity in an otherwise quiet market.
In July we expected that, "sentiment to deteriorate further in the autumn because of mortgage retractions and the need for large deposits." However, "discerning buyers will largely maintain the prices of the best houses, despite the very limited demand for property purchase over the market as a whole.... we expect to see bigger falls for the less desirable homes".
In August we anticipated that, "the latest global financial chaos will undermine confidence generally as we move into the autumn months....there will be a glut of homes for sale and prices are likely to fall in general, especially in the less affluent areas."
In September, we were not expecting, "a strong autumn market. We anticipate that the market in Surrey will slow further and vendors will either withdraw their properties or lower their prices... For those who have large deposits to put down, the low interest rates available to them make property purchase affordable and these buyers will help keep the market ticking over, again bolstering prices in the best locations while values in the less affluent parts of Surrey will continue to fall."
In November, we stated that, "hardly any glimmer of light in an already gloomy Surrey property market," and our comments about the bleak prospects for the Surrey property market made the headline news on BBC Radio Surrey and resulted in two radio interviews.
Now, as we move into 2012 we believe the bleak outlook that we have been forecasting and then experiencing, especially in the latter months of the year, will become increasingly self-evident.
CLICK HERE
FOR PAST MARKET REPORT ARCHIVE
|
| Average
property prices in Surrey |
| Land
Registry House
Price Index for December 2011
(latest monthly figures) |
| Detached
£531,134 |
Semi-detached
£277,791 |
Terraced
£239,896 |
Flat/maisonette
£187,201 |
| Average
price (all types of property) £296,250 |
Change on previous month: minus 0.1%
(Land Registry figures record completed sales. Since
there is often a time lag of several months between
an agreed sale and the actual legal completion of the
sale, the statistics reflect the state of the house-buying
market some months before they are published.)
The miniscule fall of 0.1% for December follows a 0.0% figure for the preceding month, prior to that there were tiny monthly rises of less than 1% over an eight month period. Thus, December's figure is the first in ten monthst to record a fall. However, note that each monthly figure when first published by the Land Registry is provisional as the figures are not complete and the revised, complete figures for average sales prices in recent months have been lower than the intital ones, so in a falling market the size of the drop in prices is distorted ( e.g. theinitial November figure for detached houses was £532,307, the revised figure is lower at £531,661 so when December's initial, incomplete figure of £531,134 is compared with the revised figure for November, the fall in price is smaller). It should also be remembered that the Land Registry figures are seasonally adjusted so December's figure will have been adjusted upwards. All the housing categories listed above showed a very small drop in price during December.
The comparative performance figure for all
England and Wales in December was surprisingly slightly better than Surrey's
at 0.0% while London's figure was also better than Surrey's at plus 0.8%. The average
property price for all England and Wales in December
was £160,384 while the average price for London
was £354,298.
On an annual basis (December 20010 to December
2011) the average price of property in Surrey fell by
0.1%. The comparative annual performance figure
for all properties in England and Wales between December
2010 and December 2011 was lower, at minus 1.3%. The
annual figure for London was much better than Surrey's at
plus 2.8%. Note that the average price for all
property in Surrey in December 2011 as shown above at
£296,250 is lower than the December 2007 figure
of £308,491!
The total number of sales completed during
December is not yet available. The most recent
month for which the number of completed sales has been
published by the Land Registry is October. The number
of completed sales in Surrey during October 2011 was
only 1,410. This October figure is marginally
better than October 2010 (1,402). However, the October 2011 sales
were very small when compared with October 2006 (2,494)
and indeed prior to 2007 the number of sales for October
was typically well in excess of 2,000.
Surrey Houses uses the Land Registry statistics as
a measure of the property market as we like to think
that these offer the most accurate account of property
sales. The widely publicised mortgage lenders' indices
are based on mortgage offers (which may not proceed
to actual sales - indeed around a quarter do not), include
remortgages (which are not sales), do not include properties
bought without a mortgage (traditionally about a fifth
of all sales, but more in the current climate), are
seasonally adjusted and are also weighted for property
type. The fact that the two averge price indices published
by the Halifax and the Nationwide often disagree markedly
undermines their reliability. Halifax has around 10%
of the market, Nationwide has a smaller share. The Land
Registry figures, on the other hand, record almost all
property sales.
Regrettably, the Land Registry House Price Index is
seasonally adjusted, so it does not necessarily reflect
normal seasonal changes in the property market. (Surely
it would be better not to "seasonally adjust"
the statistics? Most people can understand that market
activity naturally varies over the year and is traditionally
stronger in the spring and weaker in the winter, but
the Index masks some of these fluctuations. On the other
hand, in recent years, buying activity has not alway
kept to the old traditional pattern, and indeed some
new patterns have emerged - eg.big City-bonus spending
during the winter months in 2005 and 2006 - so how accurate
or useful is seasonal adjustment? Surely it could publish two sets of statistics, one set that is statistically adjusted and one set that isn't? The Land Registry
also does not include sales of repossessions at auction
or new-build properties or local authority homes sold
at a discount. Moreover, since
the statistics are incomplete when first published and
subsequently revised, the accuracy of the figures is
questionable. This would particularly appear to apply
to the month-to-month comparative price changes as it
seems that the comparison is made between revised (ie
more comprehensive) figures for the prior month and
initial (ie incomplete) figures for the following month,
as published in the "authoritative" Land Registry
statistics.
return to top
contact
us
Return
to Homepage |
| |

|
|